Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 4861 - 4880 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Petitioners contends that the rule must be vacated and the Panel denied the petition for review. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:21 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:36 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of StatusCLIENT: Ethiopian LOCATION: Cleveland, OH Our client came to the United States in 2003 with an F-1 student visa from Ethiopia to pursue her bachelor’s degree in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:17 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-941 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
:  GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:54 am by Benjamin Minegar
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) requires restitution calculation based upon the property a lender loses, not upon the collateral the lender receives. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:04 am by Jon Robinson
The Supreme Court of the United States refused certiorari in Jackson v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
Allcare, United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)PatentsThe Patent Act provides: “The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party,” 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court concluded that nothing in the statute conditions the court's obligation to award fees on a trial on the merits or upon a judicial determination that Maimon wrongfully retained the child within the United States, and that  the district court correctly interpreted “[a]ny court ordering the return of a child pursuant to an action brought under section 11603” to mean “any court ordering the return of a child pursuant to an action brought under the… [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:25 am by Wells Bennett
Cole; that the United States then explicitly denied the existence of any armed conflict, and held to that view until much later; and that al-Nashiri accordingly cannot be tried by military commission as a matter of law. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
United States, two cases in which the Court recently granted review that could have potential implications for the intersection of criminal law and immigration. [read post]
1 May 2014, 12:55 pm
This is the very question that is currently before the Supreme Court of the United States, (see David Riley v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:55 am by The Law Offices of Susan L. Hartman
This is the very question that is currently before the Supreme Court of the United States, (see David Riley v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Additionally, Juarez claimed the children desired to remain in the United States with her instead of being returned to Mexico with their father. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
Herisse also argued that RM's medical issues might not be as adequately addressed in Canada  as in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]