Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 8,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am
Next, the government cites United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm
United States, each of the separate opinions contended that the 16th Amendment (ratified in 1913) "overruled" Pollock v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Rather, it involves tape recordings of conversations between President Clinton and historian Taylor Branch intended to serve as a personal diary of sorts, and which eventually formed the basis of Branch’s 2009 book, “The Clinton Tapes. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:50 pm
” Thomas praised Justice John Marshall Harlan’s sole dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:49 pm
The answer is no, for reasons explained by Justice Alito in his four-member dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm
The case decided today, Jesner v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:52 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Blackman cites the 1926 case of Myers v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 7:46 am
Justice Randy Sue Marber's decision last week in Chimichurri Chicken Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:20 am
In Water Splash v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:26 am
She suspects the policy could be challenged on the same grounds as the West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
Administrative Procedure Act for rulemaking, arguably, impose recognized limits on executive branch discretion. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am
State Department provided a detailed rebuttal in 2017. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
In People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
Under the [governing statute], a state-court decision can be set aside on federal habeas review only if it is "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
If it denies review, then the political branches would seem to have nearly unlimited authority. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:45 am
’s motion for summary judgment in the underlying action (Spitzer v Newman, 163 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2018] [ citations omitted]). [read post]
