Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 11,313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
At the same time, “[w]hile the Mercedes itself is not within the United States, that alone does not defeat the court’s ability to obtain jurisdiction over it. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Of summary judgment:The court must view all facts and draw reasonable inferencesin the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.Scott v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
At the time the Convention was crafted, it could not have been envisaged that Article 3 (and Article 8, in its train) would ultimately entail an obligation on signatory states to protect individuals from actions taken by, or within the territory of, non signatory states – the so called “extra-territorial effect” created by various rulings of the Strasbourg Court, most notably Chahal v United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:32 am
“First, [they] contend that the activities of the poker companies took place outside of the United States and therefore were not conducted in, and did not violate, the law of any state. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:03 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Fargo disclosed the use of a low frequency (LF) RFID tag, but stated this was only an example and noted that a more powerful (high frequency (HF)) tag could be used. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:03 am
United States (1963). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:03 am
United States (1963). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
’ United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:21 am
" This Court has acknowledged that "state constitutional and statutory law is subordinate to … 'the [United States] Constitution[.]'" Accordingly, the unborn plaintiffs fail to assert a legally cognizable and protected interest as persons pursuant to these repealed statutes, which are contrary to the United States Constitution as construed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
"The demise of the MPPC happened in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:36 am
M and Others v Her Majesty’s Treasury, Case C? [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
It recently filed such a letter in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
A similar but much more expansive point has been made in the United States, by legal scholar Randy Barnett, who has repeatedly argued for a converse “presumption of liberty” where state action challenges the personal liberty of individuals. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
