Search for: "People v. House" Results 4881 - 4900 of 13,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 4:05 pm
  And, thanks to the more than 650,000 people just like you who signed the petition supporting Rep. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm by Patrick@nimblelight.com
However, it is crucial to remember that the police need search warrants to search the cell phones of people they arrest, as per the Supreme Court ruling in Riley v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Kevin Russell
Does the Court's decision in Parents Involved v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Although House Republicans voted to replace Paul Ryan as Speaker of the House, the new leadership immediately jumped on McConnell’s bandwagon. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of people to be secure in the persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures .... [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
People regularly call it the Octopus. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
Nearly two weeks have passed since the Department of Justice filed a controversial brief in Smelt v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:17 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Housing charity Finally, I came across an interesting housing based charity this week Project Sun, giving loans to people in Nicaragua a chance to light their homes using solar panels. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
The judge began his analysis of that issue by explaining that the 4th Amendment protects `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Even if government were permitted to conjure an interest in support of the present prohibition on beer label speech, that prohibition would only be "another case of 'burn[ing] the house to roast the pig.'" Sable Commc's of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:54 am
For information regarding subscribing to Gallerywatch services contact http://www.gallerywatch.com  Subscription needed for online access: 12/08/2009 Court Filing: Cobell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
However, in the leading case of Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681l , the House of Lords held that a hospital did have an operational duty to take reasonable steps to protect a mental health patient from suicide where that patient was detained under the MHA. [read post]