Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 4881 - 4900 of 5,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
Kevin Elliott received his doctorate in the History and Philosophy of Science (Notre Dame), and he is currently an Associate Professor in Michigan State University. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
If they will not do it on their own, Congress and the state legislatures must prod them into it by adopting such standards by legislation. 3. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm by Peter Margulies
To obtain an order from the FISC authorizing surveillance, the government needs to show probable cause that the target is an agent of a foreign power, which could include a state such as Russia or a nonstate actor such as ISIS or al-Qaeda. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by familoo
This, the judge, stated should help concentrate minds on the relevant issues in cross-examination.) [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
I am conscious that I have done little to disguise my bias in considering the two rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
” [7]  The figures also suggest that the negative bias of some lay investors towards derivatives is wrong. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That was the question that was asked of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Emma v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]