Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 4881 - 4900
of 10,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
§924(e)(2)(B)(ii), is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
States. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:24 pm
Os poetas e os artistas tentam o tempo todo conter em algum tipo de símbolo, ou de código o que sentem e sua visão de mundo.Seus símbolos e seus códigos, são as obras que produzem, que como tudo mais, foram interpretadas, são interpretadas, e serão interpretadas e / ou percebidas, de acordo com a realidade de quem as vê, lê ou ouve.Nenhuma máquina vai tentar… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
(Citibank was not required to produce a written agreement to recover on account-stated theory) -- CONTRA -- Tully v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:07 am
” B. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
§ 9003(e)(1). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:30 am
§ 9003(e)(2)(b). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm
Recent state legislation related to biosimilars is an evolving, fascinating area of law—with some states affirmatively prohibiting biosimilar substitution. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Furthermore, a specific obligation on Member States to establish such rules has also not been laid down”. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
The Court is not unmindful that this analysis appears to be at odds with the Court of Appeals decision in People v Rodriguez (68 NY2d 674 [1986], revg for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Lazer, J., 113 AD2d 337, 343-348 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Instead, just include it loose, together with a completed form 1040-V (downloads as a pdf) in your envelope. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
§9003(e)(2)(B). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
FTC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
” State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Chandler, supra.The court goes on to explain that[w]e review de novo the issue regarding whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm
Grant v. [read post]
