Search for: "State v. Long." Results 4881 - 4900 of 51,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Erin Carroll
And news organizations litigated landmark cases, like New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Color-Blindness in University Admissions Will be Difficult to Enforce and Lead to Much More LitigationIn his dissent in Gritter v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Holly Brezee
A “state” mark protects the mark in connection with goods or services in the particular state or states in which the mark is registered (like a federal mark but limited to the specific state that grants the registration). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:14 am by Charlotte Garden
ShareAt Wednesday’s oral argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
  [1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25… [read post]