Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 8,655
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Francis Professor in Law Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Director, Strauss Center for International Security & Law The University of Texas at Austin Before the House Armed Services Committee February 26, 2015 “Outside Perspectives on the President’s Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” Chairman Thornberry, Ranking Member Smith, and members of the committee, thank you for the… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
In the alternative, the government asks that the injunction be amended to cover only aliens residing in Texas, since the State of Texas is the only plaintiff that Judge Hanen found to have standing--or, at the very least, that the judge should tailor his injunction so that it does not apply in states that are not party to the suit, including a dozen states that have filed a brief explaining that DAPA will substantially benefit them and their… [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1985 ruling in Heckler v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:55 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
ACA litigation, including King v Burwell Self-reporting ACA violations Other topics, including cafeteria plan elections, etc. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
Kemp & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm
” Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am
The U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:19 am
Brady v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
The White House has indicated it will appeal the decision, handed down in a lawsuit against the federal government brought by 26 states (State of Texas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
” The court also cited the argument by Texas and the other state plaintiffs that DAPA “constitutes a significant change in immigration law that was not implemented by Congress. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:52 pm
The case of Glossip v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:53 am
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Wen Fa looks back at Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Riley v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
If you live in the states covered by the 6th U.S. [read post]
