Search for: "In re An. C." Results 4901 - 4920 of 28,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
In re Skeeziks, LLC, Serial No. 78435362 (September 26, 2008) [not precedential].The law is clear that the title of a single work is not registrable, and this rule applies to musical recording, printed publications, and live theatrical productions. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:08 pm by Sami Azhari
Often, individuals are eligible to lawfully re-instate their license after a period of time or if certain conditions are met, but either are unaware they can do so or have not gotten around to it. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 2:03 am
[C]ompanies far outside the media industry have embraced blogging as just another business tool. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
—A petitioner in an inter partes review 9 may request to cancel as unpatentable 1 or more claims 10 of a patent only on a ground that could be raised under 11 section 102 or 103 and only on the basis of prior art con- 12 sisting of patents or printed publications. 13 ‘‘(c) FILINGDEADLINE. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:48 am by dbllawyers
LLCs provide the limited liability of corporations, yet are taxed as partnerships, that is, there is only one level of taxation, unlike C corporations. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 5:03 am
Taking sua sponte action, the Federal Circuit has ordered an en banc rehearing of the In re Biliski case with regard to the following five questions concerning claim 1 of U.S. patent Application No. 08/833,892:1. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
 We're talking about involving a totally unrelated judge.) [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
“I don’t think we’re going to do major legislation this year — maybe next year. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 9:58 am by Andrew Delaney
If aggravated sexual assault on a child has elements A, B, C, D, E and if sexual assault has elements A, B, C, the latter is a lesser-included of the former. [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
The California Rules of Court include that in their definition of active efforts: We note that the California Supreme Court is currently reviewing the validity of California Rules of Court, rules 5.482(c) and 5.484(c) in In re Abbigail A. (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1450, review granted September 10, 2014, S220187. [read post]