Search for: "People v. Harding"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 8,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2008, 8:44 am
It's more usual to see trademark/right of publicity claims against ads for expressive works, but we can use a variant of the Rogers v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
As Janer prepares to test the defense in Bay County, a state Court of Appeals is grappling with the same issues in the case of People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 8:51 am
Here’s a quick chronology, as set forth in the relevant court opinion, Stewart v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 pm
—Twinsectra Limited v Yardley and Others, [2002] UKHL 12, at para. 112. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am
#DiversityandInclusion #racialequityNonprofit Quarterly: “Philanthropy is failing to combat the systemic harms that young people of color experience. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:37 pm
In 1995, the opinion in the case Stratton-Oakmont v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
" The Court of Appeals allows his case to proceed.The case is McGarry v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:59 am
Naturally, some people might try to defend this on the grounds that prosecutors won’t apply the statute as broadly as it’s written, but will instead focus just on “extreme” cyberbullying; but I think Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in last week’s United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm
It is hard to plead to mandatory jail time. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:49 am
The case, Flava Works, Inc v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:08 am
For starters, the Supreme Court said in the famous SEC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Army found out the hard way. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
What struck the IPKat is the fact that the most successful infringers are the most invisible, those whose products are so well made, or so low-profile, as to be undetectable or at any rate hard to detect. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:12 am
The Court of Appeals says the no-demonstration zone was legal.The case is Marcavage v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
However, a federal appeals ruling last week in Massachusetts (Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
Many people would probably name the Scenic Hudson opinion, but my nominee would be a decision many decades earlier: Woodruff v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:23 am
At the same time, it might be hard to prove adverse effects / injury for non-specific subsidies, so perhaps the practical implications are not as great as they sound. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
The opioid victims and their families are deprived of their hard-won relief. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 6:30 am
DeStefano v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:08 am
The hard question buried here is the role of technology intermediaries in retaining information that might help law enforcement v. protecting the privacy of customers. [read post]
