Search for: "Smith v. SMITH" Results 4901 - 4920 of 16,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Gayle and his teammate Dwayne Smith gave evidence as did Ms Russell. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 8:27 am
Smith Select Disc. (1660) vii. v. 325).4. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Garrett Hinck, Matthew Kahn
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:30 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
This week Professors Chesney and Vladeck start with a close look at Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:33 am
In this guest post, she shares her thoughts and updates us on the related developments.Pemetrexed pops up in MilanGuest Kat Eibhlin gives takes us through the recent decision handed down by the Court of Milan which forms part of the long running multi-jurisdictional battle concerning Eli Lilly's patent protecting its pemetrexed (Alimta) product.Medical data in a twist - Technomed v BluecrestGuest Kat Rosie demystifies database rights with the recent decision of Technomed v… [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
Krane & Smith, APC (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 660. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
” When the Supreme Court returns to the bench next Monday morning to hear argument in Ayestas v. [read post]