Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 14,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, one of the sharpest attacks anti-federalists could make on the new Constitution was that it did not go far enough in the protection of the institution of juries.The federalists took this charge seriously and ultimately responded by, among other things, enacting the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments.The Framers expected the jury to act as a mediating body to insulate individuals from government overreaching. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
Express authorization being required, prior conduct cannot satisfy the express statutory authorization needed to form a basis for recovery against a public body. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:58 am
During his confirmation hearing when Senator Hirono asked him if he was thinking of the Rice v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 10:37 am
In Munroe-Diamond v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
In Dewsnup v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:01 pm
So holds the Washington Court of Appeals in today’s City of Seattle v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:32 pm
In 2020, the High Court rejected this argument in a jurisdictional context: see our report here and the issue has also arisen in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2007, 5:36 am
," was not an established corporation, since it had not filed incorporation papers with the Department of State, and it had never been recognized as the governing body of Montauk. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:25 am
Wexler v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
(1) Roger Shashoua (2) Rodemadan Holdings Ltd (3) Stancroft Trust Ltd v Mukesh Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) involved a dispute over a shareholders agreement governed by Indian law, which contained an arbitration clause providing for an arbitration in London, under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
The language of Regulation 13(2)(b), which stated that "the compensation body [here the MIB] shall compensate the injured party...as if...the accident had occurred in Great Britain", was clear on this point. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
Express authorization being required, prior conduct cannot satisfy the express statutory authorization needed to form a basis for recovery against a public body. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:22 am
In Anthony Nathaniel Bennett v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:32 am
Pursuant to the Uniting for Peace Resolution A/RES/377 (V) 3 November 1950, the General Assembly will hold an Emergency Session on the Ukraine at 10 a.m. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
” In 1980, the United States Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
