Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 7,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2019, 3:13 pm
Patent and Trademark Office in 2005 and several other patents in the following years. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Whether its a patent, trademark, or copyright, registering IP often provides the IP owner greater rights than if the market was unregistered. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
United Kingdom Rather than trying to summarize the national provisions in the other EPC member states myself, I thought it is better to have experts from the various jurisdictions to present the law in their home turf. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:49 am
The RFAs asked plaintiff to "admit that '[plaintiff] did not Disclose [a certain prior art reference] to the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with the prosecution of [certain patent applications]'" and defined "disclose" to mean "bringing a patent, publication, application, or other information to the attention of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:52 am
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a trademark registration and granted Louboutin trademark protection in the “red sole mark” in 2007 based upon a Section 2(d) Declaration demarcating the strength of the fashion world’s recognition of secondary meaning for the red sole trademark. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:28 pm
John Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Mayo Collaborative will look at how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
(“Avid”) appealsfrom the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals andInterferences (“the Board”) of the United States Patentand Trademark Office (“PTO”) in an ex parte reexamination,rejecting claims 1, 3–10, 12, and 16–20 of its U.S.Patent 5,499,017 (the “’017 patent”) as anticipated andobvious over three references. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 1:21 pm
"The Philippine e-Legal Forum has recently elucidated Extradition procedures and principles in the United States.PHOSITA directs us to a quiz to test our trademark knowledge.PLI - Patent Blog posts on USPTO Request for more comments re: Markush Rules.Prawfs Blawg asks Are Law Students Too Smart? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:37 am
The first permits judicial review by direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:37 am
The first permits judicial review by direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
11 May 2013, 6:00 am
Technical publications often describe researchin patent-heavy fields, apparently without fear of lawsuits.At a recent conference reported in the Trademark,& Copyright Journal, a spokesman stated that “researchhas been spurred rather than inhibited as a result of the[Myriad] patents, citing 18,000 researchers who havepublished over 10,000 articles . . . . [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
The real story is less exciting, but nonetheless not devoid of interest: "President of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys Alasdair Poore has praised the Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for his readiness to listen to international users of the American IP system. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
Peeled registered the mark “PEELED SNACKS” on January 10, 2006 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:32 pm
Today, on Patriots’ Day out in Boston, Bill Ferrell has a piece on why the phrase isn’t trademarked. [read post]
Free Speech: Prohibition on Registering Disparaging Marks is Unconstitutional, Federal Circuit Rules
22 Dec 2015, 11:58 am
Judge O’Malley’s concurrence argues that, in addition to serving as an unconstitutional speech limitation, section 2A is also “unconstitutionally vague, rendering it unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
” […] Based on the claim construction, the parties to the Colorado litigation stipulated to dismiss the case with prejudice, which the Colorado Court granted.e.Digital Corp., at *3-4.After the Colorado case, the United States Patent and Trademark Office cancelled claims 1 and 19 of the ’774 patent in an ex parte reexamination. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
Ethical issues can impact examination, for example in trying to amend claims to exclude unethical matter (see for example decision T1441/13which shows the difficulties of disclaiming certain embryo stem cells).However for the moment the uncertainties we have in Europe in patenting biotech inventions are dwarfed by the tremendous uncertainty created in the US by the Supreme Court decisions Mayoand Myriadand the fact that Guidanceissued from United States Patent and… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:35 pm
In the interest of full disclosure, the Federal Register also notes that "an applicant filing an international application under the PCT in the United States Receiving Office (the United States Patent and Trademark Office) is not required to use the United States Patent and Trademark Office as the International Searching Authority," as "[t]he European Patent Office (except for… [read post]
