Search for: "United States v. Herring"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 23,745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Both Jon and Mike referenced the infamous exchange from United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
Judge Carmichael, after a virtual conversation with her mother unrelated to the trial, figures out how to reach the brothers. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
McGirt v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:39 am
In Affainie v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
Poppins discuss the state of her new quarters and of her large and magical carpet bag. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the… [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:33 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:19 am
Its decision focused on the nature of the harm necessary for Article III standing as outlined in the United States Supreme Court’s 2016 Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court today resolved United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
United States, Welch v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
