Search for: "University System v. State" Results 4901 - 4920 of 8,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
This is Part 2 of a paper given to the City University Forum on “Re-Framing Libel” on 4 November 2010. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 9 conference)   Returning Relists Quality Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am by Liron Libman
Jurisdiction During negotiations over the Rome Statute, which was adopted in 1998, some states supported endowing the ICC with universal jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Although the Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am by John Jascob
The former lawmakers agreed that the reforms put the American financial system on a much stronger footing that lasts to this day, despite attempts to roll back reforms. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Sabeel Rahman, Brooklyn Law School Recent Biden Administration reforms will better prepare the regulatory system to meet society’s challenges. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
A similar view was reached by the Divisional Court in R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] 1 WLR 2009 and by Blake J in R (G) v Chief Constable of Surrey Police [2016] 4 WLR 94. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
The additional costs arising from geographical distances and different national procedural systems may in themselves constitute a non-negligible handicap to the enforcement of rights, although this is true for both parties to the litigation. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  The state systems are set up differently, but each is modeled on a short-term disability-insurance system to which employees contribute. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 10:23 am
"  What these and similar phrases mean is that, while the Constitution is universally understood to grant judges enormous power to enforce the transcendent principles on which our system of government is based, those transcendent principles differ from circuit to circuit, state to state, even town to town. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]