Search for: "Administrative Hearing Office" Results 4921 - 4940 of 19,036
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(The hearing was continued to Jan. 27, 2020, but has since been taken off calendar, Doc. 224.00.) [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 1:03 am by Lindsey Meuser Rowland
Meuser, Yackley & Rowland won at the Office of Administrative Hearings and at the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Bernstein
Servs, an administrative law judge overturned an SBA hearing officer's ruling that a Sephardic Jew whose ancestors had fled Spain centuries earlier was ineligible for certification as a Hispanic. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Adm. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:58 am by William Ford
From the outset of the hearing, lawmakers questioned the wisdom of the administration’s push for South Korea to pay an additional several billion dollars in this year’s SMA. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
” On the day of the discharge, the office administrator completed a separation notice citing “lack of work” as the basis for termination. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
You might be surprised to hear about one strategy that was near the top of the list: Get every vehicle occupant to buckle up. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” Blue Sky Cops & Robbers: “The Story You are About to Hear is True. . . [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 6:50 pm by Bill Marler
“This is an ongoing investigation into an outbreak that was identified in December,” Food Safety News learned from Peter Cassell, a press officer for the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:34 pm by Donald V. Le
” Compliance with a PRA request for records relating to sustained findings of sexual assault seems straightforward where imposed discipline has been upheld after an administrative hearing. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Randy Milch, Sam Bieler
Another, Office Depot, while tagged as a data security case, actually deals with advertising misrepresentations. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed the action, finding that Petitioner's default precluded review of the order* and Petitioner appealed.The Appellate Division, affirmed the lower court's ruling, observing that Petitioner had not answered or otherwise contested the Department's charges and thereafter failed to appear at a hearing before the designated Hearing Officer and, as a result of Petitioner's failure to appear, the Hearing Officer… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed the action, finding that Petitioner's default precluded review of the order* and Petitioner appealed.The Appellate Division, affirmed the lower court's ruling, observing that Petitioner had not answered or otherwise contested the Department's charges and thereafter failed to appear at a hearing before the designated Hearing Officer and, as a result of Petitioner's failure to appear, the Hearing Officer… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am by John Bolesta and Keahn Morris
Importantly, this proposed new rule was promulgated pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, meaning the rule cannot be ignored or reversed by way of a board case decision. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:09 pm by CharlesB
The NTEU represents attorneys and decision writers who work for Social Security’s Office of Hearings Operation (OHO). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 11:47 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Other items include hearing aid compatible headset rules, Video Relay Services (for the disabled), modernizing broadcast TV notice delivery requirements, and an enforcement action. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 11:28 am by John T. McDonald and Saranne Weimer
First, the Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development can impose an administrative “misclassification penalty. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
” And James Monroe refused to provide information about particular charges against a naval officer, reasoning that “the publication of those documents might tend to excite prejudices which might operate to the injury” of the ongoing investigations of the charges against the officer. [read post]