Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 4921 - 4940 of 32,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In conclusion, a New Jersey dog does not get two bites. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:00 am by Asher Bearman
That status causes the limited FFI or limited branch to be subject to FATCA withholding but does not disqualify the expanded affiliated group from becoming non-compliant FFI through 2015. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:57 am by Miquel Montañá
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the presence of a foetal nucleic acid sequence from the Y chromosome is detected. 8. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by Attorney Aaron Konopasky
  The most obvious ones are workers who had conservative treatment for 6 or 8 weeks and then had surgery. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:59 am
They found that false claims—that is, factually false or unsubstantiated—were rare; only 1 in 10 was deemed “false. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Matthew Kolken
Affording Congress an Opportunity to Address Family SeparationBy the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., it is hereby ordered as follows:Section 1. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 3:33 am by Jon Hyman
No matter the perpetrator (co-worker, manager, owner, customer, vendor, contractor, whomever), a brewery's responsibility is exactly the same, which I've synthesized into 8 steps. 1.) [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 3:23 am by John L. Welch
Cir. 2003).Acquired distinctiveness may overcome a Section 2(e)(3) refusal, provided that the mark became distinctive prior to enactment of the NAFTA Implementation Act on December 8, 1993. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Symbolic I, 116 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1412;Symbolic II, 2015 WL 6746544, at *8; Symbolic III, 2015WL 6746545, at *8. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:11 pm by Mark Young
Furthermore, a finding of invalidity of the Directive does not cancel the ability for Member States under the e-Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC) to oblige retention of data. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:11 am by Valerie M. Eifert
 The ALJ concluded that this section of the agreement had a chilling effect on Section 7 rights in violation of Section 8 (a)(1) of the Act. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 3:11 am by Mary Beth Boyce
Contact us today for a free confidential, no-obligation case consultation at 1-877-746-5680. [read post]
29 May 2017, 11:54 pm by Eleonora Rosati
In 2015, a first judgment rejected a new argument: the taste of the cheese “Heks’nkaas”, a Dutch cheese, could be a protected creation under author rights.However, this is not over: the case will be brought in front of the Court of Justice, with two prejudicial question:1. [read post]