Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 4921 - 4940 of 13,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
No. 112-29, § 20(f)(1)(B), 125 Stat. 284, 334 (2011). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
And does such a requirement apply to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am by John Elwood
” The statute does not define the term “minister. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 10:21 pm by Bill Marler
The 2018 Salmonella Adelaide Outbreak As of July 24, 2018, 77 people infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Adelaide were reported from nine states – Arkansas 1, Florida 1, Illinois 7, Indiana 14, Kentucky 1, Michigan 39, Missouri 11, Ohio 2, Tennessee 1. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
To accomplish that, DOE will host a webinar on February 1, 2023, at 1:00 pm EST to solicit feedback. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The geofence is also bound by a time window dictated by when the crime is believed to have occurred (for example, between 1:00 p.m. and 1:15 p.m. on February 15, 2021)…. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
So does it make any sense to pursue a national-interest exception to any of the entry bans based on economic exigency? [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
According to the Home Office, the new legislation is necessary because “the existing legislation does not sufficiently capture the discernible and very real threat posed by state threats”. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:42 am
An F-1 student whose employment is terminated or whose compensation is reduced does not necessarily lose his/her immigration status. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
 Baker, whose report entered at Tab 1 of Exhibit 61 states: I note Ms. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
But section 29 does not apply in certain circumstances, one of which, relied on by Ms Thomas, is where the unregistered interest overrides the registered disposition under schedule 3 of the act. [read post]