Search for: "FRIDAY v. STATE" Results 4921 - 4940 of 7,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re writes that in Kansas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:38 am by Marissa Miller
Topics included abortion, religion, lawyers’ salaries, and the Justice’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:44 pm by Steve Hall
  The 1986 Supreme Court ruling in Ford v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:55 am by Florian Mueller
On Friday, Nokia proudly announced that the European Commission has chosen it to "lead the next phase of Europe's 6G flagship project" named Hexa-X. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am by Phil Dixon
Summary judgment to prison officials for denial of access to televised Friday prayer service and beard grooming policy reversed; remand for proper application of RLUIPA and Free Exercise standards Greenhill v. [read post]
Pepper, represented by Alaska Legal Services, then brought a separate lawsuit, alleging that the collection agency’s practices violated the state Unfair Trade Practices Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm by Lyle Denniston
His lawyers’ requests for the Court to spare him brought before the Justices the first scheduled execution since they agreed last Friday to hear an appeal by three Oklahoma inmates, challenging the constitutionality of the lethal-drug protocol in use in that state. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
Five states voted on whether to legalize recreational marijuana. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:40 am
Yesterday, Yale lawprof Jack Balkin had to backtrack:As I suspected, Justice Scalia did not say he would have dissented in Brown v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
This Friday, the Supreme Court will be considering 196 petitions and applications at its conference. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Adam Wagner
Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908 (29 July 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that secretly obtained documents can no longer copied and then used in divorce proceedings, overturning a rule dating back almost twenty years. [read post]