Search for: "High v State" Results 4921 - 4940 of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2015, 3:41 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This involves consideration firstly of whether the prosecution failed to disclose all material evidence, in circumstances in which such a failure would result in a violation of article 6(1), and secondly whether the defect in the trial procedures was remedied by the procedure before the appellate court He stated that in the present case it is clear from the reasoning of the High Court that it identified the correct test and also applied it to the circumstances of the case. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:13 pm
The California Supreme Court set forth criteria for checkpoints to ensure they are in compliance with the Federal and California's State Constitution in Ingersoll v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Tristan Marot
Russel v Russel stated that situations in which discretion against arbitration should be exercised are ‘few and exceptional. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Well, this is different.One of the big cases, and big disappointments, of the last Supreme Court term was United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
On Feb. 26, LiveConcept had a post titled 4th Amendment, Privacy Rights & Open WiFi which mentioned, among other things, In a recent Oregon decision, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  The most high profile case of the year was the privacy injunction in PJS v NGN. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:09 am
In the recent case of Downs v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2008] EWHC 2666 Mr Justice Collins was asked to consider whether the defendant was complying with EC Directive (91/414/EEC) (the Directive) which was implemented in the UK by the Plant Protection Products Regulations 2005. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:13 am
Rundle Ltd. [2008] EWCA Civ 429 (28 April 2008) Consistent Group Ltd v Kalwak & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 430 (29 April 2008) Winchester College & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2008] EWCA Civ 431 (29 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) G v R [2008] EWCA Crim 922 (29 April 2008) Purcell v R [2008] EWCA Crim 894 (29 April 2008) Diamond, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 923… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am by CMS
Potential exposure to opt-out claims on behalf of very large classes of data subjects could result in high-exposure claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 11:25 am by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts State Police Crack Down on DUI – Announce Sobriety Checkpoints for Plymouth County Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Results in Remand in Drug Case – Commonwealth v. [read post]