Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 16,478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 4:28 am
It’s not like you’re a judge or anything. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
Enrique Armijo Town of Gilbert: Relax Everybody Presenter: Derek Bambauer Argues that criticism of Reedis overblown/misplaced; argues in favor of the outcome. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:45 pm
If this story sounds wildly familiar, you’re not wrong. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:11 am
If you’re going to use statistics in your defense, they’d better be sound. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:13 am
Whatever you decide, don’t second guess yourself. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:59 am
"At the end of the day, it sort of comes back to ... you're either part of the Delaware legal community or you're not. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 1:12 pm
Seems we’re calling it “flawed testimony” this year: FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
You’re an adult. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
You’re an adult. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:13 am
My guess is: nothing much. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
But I guess it makes sense to have them listed for historical accuracy. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
See In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:53 pm
I'm not entirely sure I completely understand where he's going with this thought, but, yeah, I guess that's somewhat true as well. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:56 am
Even if the lawsuit were successful on ultra vires or procedural grounds, the ASA could quickly remedy the defects, either via constitutional amendment or re-voting. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
It plainly should have been a mistrial at worst, and a defense verdict at best.Anyway, then the court re-charged the jury and sent them back with modified – pro-plaintiff – instructions. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:53 am
I guess if I were just looking at the explanation itself I would say ‘not an A-plus job, but fine. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
He notes that we're told, over and over, that we can't legitimately second-guess these providers, because health care is " too complex for consumers to negotiate. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:27 pm
Could the code benefit from a 1986-style revamping to remove the bolt-ons and re-integrate the system? [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:01 am
But guess what – it isn’t the 1980s anymore! [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
” Oh, and guess what? [read post]
