Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4921 - 4940
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 4:08 am
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.The event will now dedicate one of its two panels to a discussion of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Lidl v Tesco.Starting at 2pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1… [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:10 am
Latest Filing in Jewel v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:31 pm
For example, in Coach, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:50 am
JuiceGeneration, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm
V. [read post]
Eleventh Circuit Notes Split Re Standard of Review for a District Court's Denial of a Franks Hearing
17 Jun 2009, 3:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
'” On June 26, 2013, a divided Court in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:59 am
The Advocate-General's Opinion has just issued in Case C-149/11 Leno Merken v Hagelkruis Beheer B.V., better known as the ONEL/OMEL case. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
Quoting CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Bristow v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 1:36 pm
And from the text:According to the conventional understanding of Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:53 pm
The essence of the present class action complaint was that “Wells Fargo marked up certain charges and overcharged for services in connection with mortgage loans, in violation of federal and state law. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:41 am
FragranceNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:16 am
By Mark A. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
The General Court's decision On similarity of the marks, the General Court upheld the reasoning of the Board of Appeal and stated that all of the marks used the prefix "bo to" and that in Botox's case "bo tox" did not stand for 'botulinum' and 'toxin". [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
