Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 119,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 11:42 am
SD: The State's Attorney represents DSS's interests and may require DSS to take action.NE: The County Attorney does not represent HHS's interests, and HHS may bring in its own attorney if HHS's recommendations are in conflict with those of the County Attorney. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 5:45 am
Kezar and Sylvia Kezar v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 5:45 am
Kezar and Sylvia Kezar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:20 pm
I would love to see the May 24, 2017 Court of Appeals opinion in Baker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
In the published case of Rafanello v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
In the published case of Rafanello v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
.] : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
In Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:10 pm
May 15, 2018). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
And when a state is a party, the Supreme Court may be the court of original jurisdiction. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:05 pm
’” Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg [2012] EWCA Civ 567 (10 May 2012) Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports [2012] EWCA Civ 596 (10 May 2012) PHI Group Ltd v Robert West Consulting Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 588 (10 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) LK (Somalia)), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1229… [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Kennedy (07-77) on whether a state court’s reliance on the state constitution to invalidate a state law may qualify as a “change” triggering preclearance under the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
In Securities & Exchange Commission v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
While this may seem like it is the exact same facts as Kirtsaeng, there was a key difference. [read post]
