Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 4921 - 4940 of 21,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 6:34 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The court stated that Venture had not shown that the inventors and their attorneys knew the sale that occurred prior to the filing of the patent was material and had made a deliberate decision to withhold information about it. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm by Michael Lowe
“(xvii) Any section of chapter 39, relating to explosives and other dangerous articles, except for section 836 (relating to the transportation of fireworks into a State prohibiting sale or use). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Lippmann is cited:Unlike in the classic case of Egbert v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm by Florian Mueller
But the other two patents are being challenged before the Federal Patent Court of Germany (Bundespatentgericht), which is even stricter than the EPO.Some other German Qualcomm v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 8:51 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
In 2014, Invado held discussions with Forward Science, an Illinois company, about the possibility of Forward Science becoming an independent sales agent for Invado. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery and Amy Swearer remark Tuesday’s cert grant in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Until and unless all EU member states agree on a common ground, companies that want to prohibit sales via on-line platforms throughout Europe in an attempt to preserve their brand image will face heightened risks. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that by agreeing to hear the New York gun case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]