Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 pm
”) and for mentally disabled persons and gays (Texas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
This, it is argued, may ultimately undermine the rule of law and the safeguarding of constitutional rights against the political organs of the State. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/08/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/30/07 1ST REPORT CAL.5901/31/07 2ND REPORT CAL.LAW / CORRECTNSS1905
SAMPSON -- Authorizes certain inmates serving an indeterminate sentence to receive good time allowances of up to 1/3 of their minimum sentencesSUMM : Amd SS803 & 805, Cor L Authorizes inmates serving indeterminate sentences of imprisonment for offenses involving controlled substances and marihuana to receive good time allowances against the minimum… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
To be clear, there may be very good reasons for the Senior Women Club to have restricted membership. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
See Blackwell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
There is vanishingly little case law suggesting that certification under (2) or (3) raises distinct questions under the case-or-controversy requirement, and for good reason. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
We at NRDC are proud to have been part of the state-environmental legal team that took the Bush administration to the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:33 am
While each home jurisdiction likely will have its own rules of process for the issue of letters of request[3], in practical terms the home court, usually upon the application of a party to the main proceedings, will send a letter of request through to the English Courts.[4] In dealing with such a request the English Court will apply its own rules of legal procedure and the statutory provisions of the Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975.[5] However, unless there might be… [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
The court seemed to make a judgment regarding the level of risk that was acceptable, from its point of view, for the second lien lenders to bear, in order to accommodate other, more favored, parties-in-interest. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
Article 12 is, however, ambiguous as to whether beneficiaries of temporary protection are entitled to such public goods on the basis of equal treatment. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
Applying the “right to bear arms” to these new weapons and new situations really does require careful balancing. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Some studies rely on parents’ reporting; not persuasive v. studies where a doctor confirms that the event occurred. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
We of course like preemption, but after our side lost Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 5:48 am
Judge Sullivan then went on to question his lawyers: “Do you have any concerns that potential Brady material”—that is, exculpatory evidence material to the defendant’s guilt or innocence under Brady v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
