Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 4921 - 4940 of 9,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 6:04 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We’ll list out each judgement and give links to descriptive comments/ critique on each of the cases. 1) State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:31 am by Miriam Seifter
Those proceedings, in Roberts’ words, are a state’s way of saying, “[L]ook, we don’t think we owe you anything, but we have a process for determining whether we do or not. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:45 pm by Scott McKeown
” (citing Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:18 am
The person must prove the infringement on a balance of probabilities,” the court stated in S.L. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
However, it was made in 1998, when the Court heard Quality King v L’anza, a case involving similar issues concerning the first sale doctrine and § 602. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/11/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA1898 Gunther (MS) -- Restricts consecutive hours of required work by nurses; does not prohibit a nurse from voluntarily working overtimeSUMM : Add S167, Lab L; add S6510-e, Ed L Restricts consecutive hours of work by nurses; provides that no health care employer shall require a nurse to remain on duty for a period longer than 8 consecutive hours or 40 hours in a 7 day workweek except as consistent… [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
L’Oreal v. eBay: ECJ said eBay isn’t directly or contributorily liable under TM directive; nonetheless, injunctions must be available to rightholders under enforcement directive regardless of fault. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
James L Bikoff, David K Heasley and Michael T Delaney (Silverberg Goldman & Bikoff LLP, Washington DC), writing for World Trademark Review, observe: " ... [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]