Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 4921 - 4940 of 14,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
 This was the first time the Second Circuit applied the considerations for the implied preclusion of antitrust laws by the securities laws outlined by the United States Supreme Court in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:42 pm by Sheppard Mullin
This was the first time the Second Circuit applied the considerations for the implied preclusion of antitrust laws by the securities laws outlined by the United States Supreme Court in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  As the Solicitor General stressed in his brief, it is issued “in the name of the United States” and is transmitted by the U.S. [read post]
A majority of fed cattle in the United States are sold to packing plants and processed into various beef products. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States: [The First] Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§§ 1.6(a)(2), 2.195(a)(4), and 2.198 provide that certain correspondence deposited in the Priority Mail Express® service of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in accordance with 37 C.F.R. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  Concededly, however, it’s a close and unresolved question, owing in part to the somewhat cryptic and imprecise opinion of the Court in Freytag v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  Concededly, however, it’s a close and unresolved question, owing in part to the somewhat cryptic and imprecise opinion of the Court in Freytag v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, discrimination may arise where the state fails to treat differently people whose situations are significantly different. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:27 am
However, even for a first offender, a sentence of close to two years is a starting point, the judge stated. [read post]