Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 9,559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:51 am
Part II presents both sides of the debate and why either side does or does not want the act to be passed. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
Allcare, United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)PatentsThe Patent Act provides: “The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party,” 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Ct. 3218 (2010) (invalidating Bilski’s claimed invention – a method of hedging against the occurrence of bad weather – as an unpatentable abstract idea); · Limit the doctrine of export infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Technically, the rule does not mean that all the COBRA periods start over from “day 1” after the end of the outbreak period. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:36 pm
The term does not include acts of medical diagnosis. 2. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
Teleflex Inc., the Federal Circuit has erred in applying a “lead compound test” as the exclusive standard for determining whether a patent claim directed to a new chemical compound is “obvious” and therefore invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:34 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
In its analysis of the common law doctrine, the Court quipped, "Happily, the future of digital copyright law does not turn on the confused legislative history of the control provision. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:29 am
Now go to five trends to watch.. 1. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Nadine Strossen, former President of the ACLU.] [1.] [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:51 am
In order to provide article 5 par. 3 with real effectiveness, the Court conducts a systematic and coherent interpretation of articles 5 par.3, 5 par. 1, 6 par. 1, 9 par. 1 and of the recitals 17 and 18 of the Directive. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:55 am
The written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
The current early-filing doctrine clearly does not facilitate such production. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
" [35] IBT argues with the 11th Circuit that this statement implies its converse: "Where there is any prior history of collective bargaining, the status quo provisions or RLA must apply. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:53 am
Businesses/Employers: · Starting in 2010 o Employers with 25 or fewer employees and average annual wages of no more than $50,000 are eligible for a tax credit: § 35% credit is available for for-profit employers that provide health insurance coverage and pay a minimum of 50% of the total premium cost § Full credit is available only for employers with 10 or fewer employees and average annual wages of no more… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm
The case of Lindon v France (2008] 46 EHRR 35 is a good example of the new approach of the court. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
A contract cannot take away this overtime pay entitlement.[6] Falconbridge does, however, reference the collective agreement when determining what a “work week” actually is, since ESA does not clearly command this aspect of the contract. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
For example, CAS 403 addresses the allocation of home office costs to business segments,[23] and CAS 410 governs the allocation of business unit G&A to final cost objectives.[24] CAS 418, the focus here, applies to the extent any other provision of the CAS does not require a different allocation.[25] The purpose of CAS 418 is to provide criteria for “the consistent determination of direct and indirect costs,” “the accumulation of indirect costs … in indirect… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
The big list: 1. [read post]
