Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 4941 - 4960 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
The US press response to the Abu Hamza judgment has been set out by Rosalind English on the UKHRB here. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
 The New Republic also has a  review of Norman Davies, Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations (Viking), which Jacob Soll describes as a "colossal wreck of a book. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
The applicable law to govern Innovia's breach of confidence claim was the English law. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am by Rachit Buch
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:52 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
United States Department of Defense, docket number 09-2375. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
"On 17 November 2011 the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen was published in eight languages, none of them English [though there's a good note [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Joint Equity Committee of Investors of Real Estate Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]