Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:51 am
case=7371348995759148586&q=Deans+v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
In his response brief, Chevedden pointed out that a letter from a trust server had been the standard means of verifying ownership for most shareholders because “[t]he SEC has never defined a record holder. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
• MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:24 pm
Link: The BLT: The Blog of Legal TimesLink: Taitz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:36 pm
” BACKGROUND:Ahmed Belbacha lived for years in the seaside town of Bournemouth, UK, where he studied English and worked; during a Labour conference he was responsible for cleaning the hotel room of Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott, from whom he received a healthy tip and note of appreciation. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:17 am
” Official Pillowtex, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 9:51 pm
On Friday the IPKat posted a "breaking news" item on an Irish case, EMI Records (Ireland) Ltd and others v Eircom Ltd [2010] IEHC 108, which he somewhat unhelpfully described as being the first Irish decision on that country's "three strikes" law (the Irish "three strikes" being the result of a consensual arrangement, not legislation). [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Almost all of the cases I consider were decided when Justice Souter was on the Court, and he was often in the five-Justice majority with Justice Stevens. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:22 am
Holder here. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
Eneh v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
Title: Schramm v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
In Robotti & Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
S’holders Litig., No. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Novo Nordisk v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
Holder answered yes. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:04 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Novo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:01 am
Settlement Planning Issues for DiscussionThe either "72(m)(7) disabled" OR "substantially equal periodic payments" exception afforded to disabled IRA owners and qualified plan distributees appears to apply to holders of modified endowment life insurance contracts (see IRC 72(v)(2)(B)) and 72(v)(2)(C), but DOES NOT appear to apply to holders of annuities.IRC 72(u) imposes a similar 10% penalty tax on withdrawals from annuities prior… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
Marriott International Inc. and Marriott Worldwide Corporation v. [read post]
