Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 4941 - 4960 of 7,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by WSLL
Cranfill, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): James P. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
And lest there be any doubt on the subject, the Supreme Court has long understood this very point… As Chief Justice Roberts explained for the Court two years ago in Stern v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
As we have witnessedin the last few months with Syria, Germany, and other EU states, the unlikely weaponmay have been enacted again" (Greenhill, 2010, p. 26)4.In traditional military coercion, the aim is to achieve political goals "on the cheap".Weak actors could also use mass migration to achieve political goals that would be utterlyunattainable through traditional military means or, in a more limited number of cases, forpowerful actors to achieve aims wherein the use of… [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:03 am by David Post
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit decision handed down last week (Hanover 321 Realty v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
The more concerning aspect of the quoted footnote is its obfuscation of the important distinction between the procedure of repeatedly calculating confidence intervals (which procedure has a 95% success rate in the long run) and the probability that any given instance of the procedure, in a single confidence interval, contains the parameter. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Razezicz, supra, 206 N.Y. at p. 270, 99 N.E. 557), the unsupportable “coupling” of two statutory presumptio [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has published the UK government’s long-awaited response to the consultation on the future of the UK data protection regime. [read post]