Search for: "People v. Render" Results 4941 - 4960 of 5,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Margaret Taylor
But as a practical matter, the president’s submission of Ratcliffe’s nomination on March 2 renders the 210-day period irrelevant, because Grenell can continue to serve while the Senate considers the nomination. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
In addition to talking about personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction, we should discuss scope of jurisdiction, as in the question of what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction? [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am by Cyberleagle
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
If judges do not have the interest or the time to render the required service, they should say so. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Scope of Liability             In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
Since 2015, Minneapolis police officers have used neck restraints at least 237 times, and rendered people unconscious 44 times, according to NBC News. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Keynesian taming of the business cycle rendered consumer debt more chronic than periodic, depriving wage workers of ready external explanations for their insolvency. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control:  "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am by Shalev Roisman
” Prakash uses the term broadly to include any form of interpretation that allows for “informal constitutional change” outside the Article V amendment process (see pp. 112-13, 130). [read post]