Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 4941 - 4960 of 16,440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Daniel Hemel
At first glance, BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am by INFORRM
  True, Sir Philip can afford expensive lawyers, but on any view this was no longer a David v Goliath case. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:11 am by Katherine A. Campbell
Several of the buildings on the site are in an unsafe state and contain hazardous material, including asbestos. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The nexus between state, CPC and United Front through the CPPCC, then, serves as the connective tissue between CPC and State constitutions, and between the political authority of the CPC and its exercise through the rule system, it itself has mandated as its own political line. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:44 am by Giesela Ruehl
Therefore, in the light of the strong public interest in the enforcement of English court orders, it was not necessary for the Bank to obtain permission to serve the committal order outside the jurisdiction [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Schachtman
Several state and federal courts have concurred in the context of cancer causation claims.13 In the context of birth defects litigation, the Public Affairs Committee of the Teratology Society has weighed in with strong guidance that counsels against extrapolation between different birth defects in litigation: “Determination of a causal relationship between a chemical and an outcome is specific to the outcome at issue. [read post]