Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 4961 - 4980 of 95,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kevin
 After all, almost everybody who is on "The Apprentice" gets fired, don't they? [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  This conflict is never more sharp than when a CEQA plaintiff’s counsel seeks relief from a default or mistake that would otherwise terminate a CEQA action in the defendant’s favor. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 7:16 am
Hartford ("The plaintiff first claims that because all of the expert witnesses, including those found credible by the commissioner, agreed that the trochanteric bursitis in her right hip was causally related to her October, 1996 injury, the dismissal of the bursitis claim should be reversed. ...The plaintiff next claims that she made a prima facie case by a preponderance of the evidence that her right hip injuries were work related, and the defendants failed to rebut… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:54 am
These cases represent a third of all disposed civil trial cases based on a "nationally representative sample of urban, suburban, and rural jurisdictions. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:47 am
Plaintiffs' marketing is completely different. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:55 am by Moseley Collins
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION STATES CLAIMS FOR WILFUL OR RECKLESS NEGLECT OR ABUSE OF AN ELDER Plaintiffs State A Claim for Willful or Reckless Neglect of An Elder By Alleging That Defendants Chose To Maximize Profits By Understaffing And Underbudgeting Universal Care In Disregard Of Resident Safety and Welfare. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:26 am by Amanda Simon, ACLU
In the wake of a veto threat (PDF) from the Obama administration, the intelligence authorization bill could be in jeopardy, all over some revisions to the "Gang of Eight" system. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:52 am
As the lead named plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by the homeless against the City of Fresno, Pamela Kincaid stood up against injustice and was willing to put herself on the line to protect the rights of all homeless people in her community. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:52 pm by The Complex Litigator
Assuming you fall into the camp that doesn't want to see arbitration used to destroy all collective rights (which camp includes plaintiffs' counsel explicilty and defendants' counsel covertly), here is some good  news, compliments of The UCL Practitioner. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:23 am
Del Cid, the Tampa, Florida, case in which counterclaims for civil extortion and conspiracy were interposed against the RIAA plaintiffs, the RIAA has now moved to dismiss all of the counterclaims:Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->   Slashdot It! [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
: Best of eDiscovery DailyCourt Orders Non Party to Preserve Some, But Not All, Information Requested by Plaintiff: eDiscovery Case LawDefendant Requests Terminating Sanctions for Plaintiff, but Court Opts for Lesser Sanctions: eDiscovery Case Law  [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 6:11 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Wight & Company, the Court rejected the plaintiff school district's argument that such claims were subject to no statute of limitations at all. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:03 am by Jason Shinn
   Conclusion Preferably a thorough case analysis done as early in the litigation process as possible will avoid the all too familiar disappointing feeling of looking over a decimated March Madness bracket (thanks MSU ... and Duke ... and Missouri). [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:10 pm by Howard Friedman
The primary judge did not err in concluding that fairness to all parties required her to reject the appellant’s application.The appeals court pointed out that plaintiff had not asked the trial judge for alternative arrangements such as testifying from behind a screen so that her face would be visible only to to some of the people in the courtroom. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:00 pm by John Stigi and Alejandro Moreno
  The Court declined to require the pleading of “so-called ‘newspaper facts’—who, what, when, where and how” —in all cases under Rule 23.1, holding that even under Rule 9(b) such details are not required in all cases. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:45 am
Having breached Plaintiff's door and detained all the occupants, officers were reasonable in “exercis[ing] unquestioned command of the situation. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
All those explosions and flattened cities leave us feeling tired and hopeless, or feeling nothing at all. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
  To us, in addition to the heeding presumption being inapplicable to all prescription drug cases except those with warnings that remove all judgment by urging something like “don’t use the drug in someone exactly like this plaintiff,” it does not make sense that a heeding presumption would link up the broken causal chain from a doctor not reading the label. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 3:38 am by Andrew Trask
All you need to know is that the plaintiffs got a class certified, won at trial, and conceded that each class member was entitled to approximately $5 per landline they owned. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:50 am by Greg Mersol
  The plaintiff first moved to certify a class of all food service employees working for the employer, a number in the thousands, but then limited the class to sous chefs, a much narrower group. [read post]