Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 4961 - 4980 of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm by JB
Painter in 1950, and again in the Brown litigation in 1952, and after the Eisenhower Administration's Justice Department concurred with the Truman Administration when it came into office, that the Supreme Court finally felt comfortable overturning Plessy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
If it is argued that he did not enter into an agreement at all, the Wilken v Kohler rule would be applicable. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
Monumedia challenged the City’s decision before the Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA”), and challenged the DOT’s decision before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) from the Office of State Administrative Hearings (“OSAH”), but was unsuccessful in both cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
On November 6, 2007, the California Supreme Court heard long-awaited arguments in the closely watched "medical marijuana" case of Ross v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:00 pm
On January 24, 2014, the Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the Circuit Court of Shelby County Alabama’s decision, without opinion, in the case of Vinson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm by admin
  Collection Due Process Hearing Updates The 5th Circuit has just recently upheld the tax court in Dalton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Eric M. Freedman
When the Jefferson administration took office, it legislatively removed sixteen judges from the lower federal courts who had been put in office by the outgoing Adams administration. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Under a federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1507, any individual who “pickets or parades” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer” near a U.S. court or “near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” will be fined or “imprisoned not more… [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Williams – Yulee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:20 pm by News Desk
Supreme Court is not taking the appeal of Edwin Hardeman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The data published by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts point the other way.FinallyWe conclude that the criteria are not met for overruling or modifying the Cybor standard of de novo review of claim construction as a matter of law. [read post]