Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 4961 - 4980 of 108,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 11:02 am by David Zaring
Some people think the government will shut down if these sorts of intermediate orders are appealable; I'm not so sure. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  The Constitution does not guarantee an accused person against the legitimate consequences of his own wrongful acts. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
On appeal, the Montana Supreme Court joined a fifteen-court (state and federal) split, ruling that the Sixth Amendment speedy-trial right does not apply to sentencing. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 9:14 am by Andrew Crocker
Reiterating its prior common-sense opinion, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in hiQ v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A disagreement over the penalty assessed by the arbitrator does not constitute a basis for vacating the award2014 NY Slip Op 03627, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThis appeal flows from an arbitration award issued in 2007 that imposed a penalty of six months' unpaid suspension and mandatory counseling on a tenured teacher [Teacher] based on the arbitrator’s finding that Teacher had engaged in inappropriate contact with female students. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by David Fraser
The Federal Court of Appeal has sent the matter back to the trial level for determination, including the claims for negligence and breach of confidence and to determine the common questions in the class proceeding in relation to those claims. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by CMLP Staff
On appeal, Jenzabar argued that the court improperly granted summary judgment because it did not adequately focus on a particular type of confusion, "initial interest confusion. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:21 pm by Michael Thomas
(ad hoc)The Manitoba Court of Appeal was asked to decide a stated case on the following question of law: When the Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation makes a decision under s. 79(1) of the Act, does the claimant or victim have a choice between: (a)     a right of review under s. 172 of the Act (and a subsequent appeal under s. 174); and (b)     an appeal to the Court of Queen's Bench under s. 79(3) of the Act? [read post]