Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 4961 - 4980 of 9,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
That these are determinative factors for the purposes of Articles 4(1) and 4(2) does not exclude them from consideration under 4(3). [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Specifically, the tax increase took effect because fiscal year 2020 revenue levels did not exceed fiscal year 2019 levels by more than 5 percent.[11] Tennessee Effective January 1, Tennessee is one of eight states that does not levy any individual income tax at all. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
  Given the relatively modest changes in play -- the top income tax bracket rising from 35% to 39.6%, for example, even if Obama does not compromise -- it really is a sight to behold, as the moneyed class tries to deal with the thought that the billion dollars or so that they spent to elect Romney/Ryan (and to buy the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
The law was published yesterday, April 17th, which means that it will become effective tomorrow, April 18, 2018.It is a very large law -- 8 1/2 pages long -- too much for me to cover in this post. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
., 35 NY3d 492, 505 n 8; see Foy v State of New York, 71 Misc 3d 605 [Ct Cl]). [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
., 35 NY3d 492, 505 n 8; see Foy v State of New York, 71 Misc 3d 605 [Ct Cl]). [read post]
6 May 2017, 10:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Breckenridge”)does not directly infringe or induce infringement ofthe asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
The law was published yesterday, April 17th, which means that it will become effective tomorrow, April 18, 2018.It is a very large law -- 8 1/2 pages long -- too much for me to cover in this post. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
The law was published yesterday, April 17th, which means that it will become effective tomorrow, April 18, 2018.It is a very large law -- 8 1/2 pages long -- too much for me to cover in this post. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Just Toys, Inc. generally does not sanction obviousness considerations under subsection 102(f). [read post]
12 May 2018, 3:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Id. at 1172 n.2 (internal quotation marks andcitation omitted); see 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm by Frank Pasquale
" But this pinched redistributionism, focused on reducing subsidies to the middle class amidst skyrocketing incomes and wealth for the 1%, strikes many voters as unfair. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:57 am
(1) A "codification" of existing CJEU case law: a good attempt? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
”  Id. at 34-35 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 4:04 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]