Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 4961 - 4980 of 15,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 8:07 am
Le cadre multilatéral étatique de l'OCDE se révèle déficient et insuffisant. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:45 am by Mirriam Seddiq
Scott Greenfield wrote yesterday of the ABA's forward thinking task force devoted to determining something something something about Padilla v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Fifthly it was clear that B. was not a public figure or a politician but an ordinary person who had been the subject of criminal proceedings (see Schwabe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
There's only one published opinion from the Ninth Circuit today. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant requestedthat the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the main request (patent as granted) or on the basis of any of the first to seventh auxiliary requests filed with letter dated 13 October 2017.The appellant requested furtherthat, should novelty be acknowledged, the case be remitted to the opposition division for having a first instance decision on inventive step.The appellant requested moreoverthat the intervention of respondent II… [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant requestedthat the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the main request (patent as granted) or on the basis of any of the first to seventh auxiliary requests filed with letter dated 13 October 2017.The appellant requested furtherthat, should novelty be acknowledged, the case be remitted to the opposition division for having a first instance decision on inventive step.The appellant requested moreoverthat the intervention of respondent II… [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm by Giles Peaker
Indeed her income figures suggested some payment may have been possible, but had not been made. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
Whilst it is not hard to see why both sides asked the Court to proceed on this assumption, it seems that this is not necessarily a correct assumption and indeed before the referendum, two senior figures (Sir David Edward – a former CJEU judge and Professor Derrick Wyatt QC – a leading constitutional lawyer at the University of Oxford) opined that this was not so and that it was possible for the UK to pull out of pulling out, so to speak. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Against the backdrop of these alarming figures, the European Court of Human Rights (‘the Court’) has provided a ray of hope with its admissibility decision in Lenis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:45 am
 The number of books scanned into Google Book Search now stands at 15 million, and the figure continues to rise. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the decision in Callery v Gray approving a figure as a reasonable premium in road traffic cases at the time has set that figure as a base-line and has resulted in the eradication of downward pressure in the market; and that the requirement for a Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil statement does not in practice ensure that premiums are competitive".Later the Report observes: "In Callery v Gray (Nos 1 and 2)… [read post]