Search for: "GRANT v. STATE" Results 4961 - 4980 of 61,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am by Aaron Barkoff
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:26 am by Don Cruse
The Texas Supreme Court reversed and remanded for the court to consider the analysis in its more recent decision State v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court has granted two cases, CompuCredit v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 11:07 pm
Defendants in parallel civil and criminal cases involving allegations of securities fraud won a significant victory earlier this month when two SDNY judges granted their motions to be permitted to pay for lawyers of their choice from untainted funds, and ordered a hearing under United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:14 am
Astute readers may recall that last week the Supreme Court granted cert in Carr v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 7:37 pm by Michael DelSignore
The standard for providing an intellectual disability may soon change if the United States Supreme Court grants cert to the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
As stated in our Rules, “[a] petition for a writ of certiorari is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of . . . the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law,” this Court’s Rule 10. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting dissent from denial of review by Texas's high court for criminal cases.From today's opinion in Ogle v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
As I noted above, the Court did not grant any new cases today, and it denied review of the seven petitions arising out of challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
In late May 2008, the United States - in response to the Court's late January call for the views of the Solicitor General - filed a brief in which it urges the Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
This practice is in keeping with the ordinary deference granted state courts when they interpret matters of state concern. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 12:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
High Court Review in Cisco Case put the questionThe question is whether an accused company [here Cisco, accused of inducing infringement] can defend itself by arguing it had a good-faith belief the disputed patent was invalid because the invention was obvious, vague or insufficiently novel.The CAFC had stated as to inducement of infringement:It is axiomatic that one cannot infringe an invalid patent. [] Accordingly, one could be aware of a patent and induce another to perform the steps of… [read post]