Search for: "Hand v. State" Results 4961 - 4980 of 30,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 12:12 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The article reports on a Order handed down by Dauphin County Judge Richard Lewis in the case of Welcomer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
The Privy Council has not announced any judgments for hand down this week. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Thursday 12 July 2012 the Judicial Committee will hand down judgment in Kelly & ors v Fraser. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 1:48 pm by Chris Williams
Is it anti-Christian for a swearing President to opt out of putting their hand over the Bible? [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:24 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court today decided the Facebook threats case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
Alison Grant had a lengthy article Sunday in the Plain Dealer on the Eaton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
The court order states that this information is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm
This kind of strong language is rare for the state's highest court, which handed down a unanimous 5-0 decision in the case. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
This was the question tackled by the Kluwer Patent Blog, which takes a look at emerging forensics methods in the PRC, which aim to make the process of collecting evidence in China slightly easier and more cost efficient.Right to be forgottenIPWatchdog looks at the global implications of Google v CNIL, which addressed requests for de-referencing (or 'the right to be forgotten'), with the case ultimately ruling that de-referencing only need be carried out on versions of the… [read post]
1 May 2007, 10:46 am
TENTH DEFENSE (UNCLEAN HANDS) - Plaintiffs' claims are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of unclean hands. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
This type of provision, however, has survived in a number of  collective bargaining agreement [see New York State Off. of Mental Health v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 53 A.D.3d 887].* Pursuant to OATH Rule of Practice section 1-49(d), respondent had requested that "Anonymous" be used in reporting this decision. [read post]