Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Wald, for which I served as a co-editor along with Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Beth Van Schaack, and Kathleen A. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
In Triangle Publications v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:08 pm
Mass. 1975) (3-judge court), and the one decision cited in that case, State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:32 pm
Stamer’s services, experience, presentations, publications, and other credentials or to inquire about arranging counseling, training or presentations or other services by Ms. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm
Ally Shahabuddeen on Friday, in Travis v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm
California state rules mandate judicial approval (and thus public disclosure) of the private settlement of a purported class action – even in its pre-certification infanc [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
Coty that a trademark may always be used to “tell the truth” about the identity of the goods and services at issue. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained this rationale in the nineteenth century case, Rude v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
He is also passionate about the public’s access to the law. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Also, there is a fear that, without accountability for errors by those in the practice of medicine, opportunities for correction of unacceptable medical care may be lost.Expert WitnessesOne of the more recent state Supreme Court decisions, Freed v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Over the past two years, U.S. public companies faced an unpredictable risk environment. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
In 1970, the United States filed United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Southern Rhode Island Development Co. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Under a judgment entered in Solis v. [read post]
