Search for: "State v. Register" Results 4961 - 4980 of 13,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
The Divisional Court had little difficulty in answering the case stated in the negative. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm by Green and Associates
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in Schedules II… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm by Green and Associates
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in Schedules II… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017;  Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:46 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
At issue is the line between advice and the practice of veterinary medicine, the very issue-in-suit in Hines v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Bidish Sarma discusses Packingham v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:41 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The test is the result of 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling in Quill Corp. v. [read post]