Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 15,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 5:03 am
This paper will critically question the justification of reliance on recidivism studies by both state and federal legislatures in implementing Megan's Laws. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:01 am
The New York State Assembly is already considering a law to designate fracking liquids “hazardous waste“. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
As we stated in part I, the firms that had blogs tended to fall into two camps: Blog-Proud: These firms actually make it very easy to find their attorney's blogs. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:34 pm
Supreme Court decided Montejo v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
Similarly, post-9/11, cases involving habeas as a means of challenging executive detention (the original purpose of the Great Writ) played a more prominent role than when I studied the material as a student.For this year's version of the course, I'm planning to open the first day with a brief summary of Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
Taylor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
SCOTUSblog has previously set forth the particulars of this case, which is styled Bruesewitz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:37 am
Ruttiger, handed down in June, and Stancil v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Mission Statement: The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy (ASCE) is a non-profit, non-political organization incorporated in the state of Maryland in 1990. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:34 am
Supreme Court unanimously decided a case (Riley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
That was the title to a study conduced for Industry Canada in 1997. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:13 am
Gomez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See, e.g., Peary v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
Durkin The recent Apple v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
The Appellate Division decided the case of Township of Cinnaminson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
The Appellate Division decided the case of Township of Cinnaminson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:50 am
When I was a student, the first day of my “Administrative & Regulatory State” course featured discussion of a single case: Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
If it can be established that the public perception of the word is influenced by the use of the colour it denotes, then this should be taken into account in assessing the word mark’s distinctiveness.Brett Shandler recently completed his studies at Melbourne Law School and the Center for Transnational Legal Studies in London. [read post]
