Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 4961 - 4980 of 9,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2024, 3:00 am by Sherica Celine
Subchapter V Decision Tracker – Keep up to date on key legal developments with three new cases in August (so far)! [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
 The AmeriKat canvouch that shaving off needless fluff is actuallyvery liberating, especially in the summer. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:42 am
 As the Court of Appeal of England and Wales stated in Murray v Big Pictures [here], this is "an objective question", "which takes account of all the circumstances of the case. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:17 am by David Oscar Markus
  This time it's a confrontation clause issue in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 am by kblocher@hslf.org
A DOJ injunction led to the transfer of roughly 4,000 beagles last summer, and the company ultimately closed that facility. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
Publishers I   Do you remember the Public Consultation on the Review of EU Copyright Rules [here and here], and the tweet by everybody's favourite Commissioner, ie Commissioner for Internal Market and Services Michel Barnier, announcing that the Commission would publish a White Paper before the summer break [and likely end of current Commission term, sighs an already nostalgic Merpel]? [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Milano, Tecnica Group S.p.A. v Diana S.r.l., decision No 493/2021, 25 January 2021) in a copyright infringement case – decided nearly a year ago – that Tecnica successfully brought against the maker of Chiara Ferragni-branded after ski boots. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:27 am
The KitKat KatIt will not have escaped readers that last week the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Nestlé v Cadbury [2017] EWCA Civ 358, ie the KitKat trade mark dispute. [read post]