Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 13,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Decision California’s Marriage of Cassinelli (2016) 4 CA5th 1285, 210 CR3d 311, a decision reached by our own Fourth Appellate District, Division Two in Riverside, is now published and citable per California’s Judicial Council (but note that a Petition for Certiorari is presently docketed with the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:45 am
United States, usually referred to as the Chinese Exclusion Case. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
Green v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
If a Slovakian college student who is studying in the United States called the Clinton campaign with such information, that would be a crime. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
United States, a case on next term’s docket, and United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
And here’s United States District Judge David S. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In its 2012 ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:13 am
This could create confusion in states in which the inevitable disclosure doctrine is not permitted by state law (e.g., California, Maryland, and Virginia). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:49 am
For example, the government maintains that grandparents of persons in the United States, or grandchildren of persons in the United States, categorically do not have “bona fide relationships with persons in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing [sic] in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
United States Donald Trump’s legal team wants a defamation claim that was filed against the President by a former contestant on reality show the Apprentice to be dismissed on the grounds that it is politically motivated. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
If it says “freedom of speech,” that phrase has to be interpreted to make sense to the current citizens of the United States. [read post]
