Search for: "United States v. Small" Results 4961 - 4980 of 6,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am by Kevin Jon Heller
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual combat. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
  For example, the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, is applicable to certain Federal contracts and subcontracts that utilize service employees to furnish services in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:46 pm by David Super
  Social Security (Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) is one such program; the Judgment Fund (for judgments rendered against the United States) is another. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
California, a 1927 decision upholding the right of a Communist to advocate overthrow of the United States government. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
The CopyKat suspects she will, but to an extent it's virgin territory in the United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Right to a Public Trial – Background The right to a public trial is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Bexis
  While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
ICO The ICO blog has a post by Deputy Chief Executive Paul Arnold explaining to small businesses why they need to pay the data protection fee. [read post]