Search for: "A F
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 481 - 500
of 897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 10:17 pm
Instead, subsequent counsel filed a complaint related to the August 2003 accident in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
United States, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:32 pm
The Tax Court reasoned that since 6015(f) doesn’t expressly state a time limit, the Treasury lacked authority to impose the two year limit. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
It therefore adhered to the general rule that " '[i]f the execution of the agreement ... be fair, no further inquiry will be made' " (Levine v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
Stuart Hale Co., 1 F.3d 611, 618 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:01 am
United States, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:33 am
Correa, 653 F.3d 187 (3d Cir. 2011) (emphasis added) (quoting Bond v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Anna F. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
United States, 384 F.3d 1354 (C.A.Fed. 2004). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
United States, 384 F.3d 1354 (C.A.Fed. 2004). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
In Kopitke v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
The Tax Court reasoned that since 6015(f) doesn’t expressly state a time limit, the Treasury lacked authority to impose the two year limit. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am
Township of Indiana, 385 F.3d 274 (3d Cir. 2004) (`. . . constitutional retaliation claims are analyzed under a three-part test. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:18 am
United States, 750 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Bower v. [read post]
