Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
The relevant Codes of Practice are prescribed by the Secretary of State (or the Welsh Assembly) pursuant to s.87, Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:08 am
M. reliance was placed on AH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKUT 353 (AC) but the Court found that concerned refinancing permitted under 4(6) insofar as it does not exceed the original borrowing. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:08 am
M. reliance was placed on AH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKUT 353 (AC) but the Court found that concerned refinancing permitted under 4(6) insofar as it does not exceed the original borrowing. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The AP has this article on Azimi v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Hears Copyright Battle Between Google and Oracle First off today, Adam Liptak at The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Google v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:04 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Ace Motor Sales, 550 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In the alternative – if that analysis was wrong – the judge found that the decision to make and affirm the Order must be part of a process of determination of the bank’s civil rights of the kind analysed by Lord Clyde in R (Alconbury) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] 2 AC 295 in paragraphs 145 to 160. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:05 pm
” People United For Children, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition… [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2017) EWCA Civ 1624 This is an important court of appeal decision on the meaning of ‘significantly’ in Lord Neuberger’s definition of vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996 in Hotak v Southwark LBC (2015) UKSC 30, [2016] AC 811 (our report). [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
As identified in People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:27 pm
Facts: This case Via Vadis, LLC et al v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am
Creative faces the same presumption of validity faced by all ac- cused infringers and must prove invalidity by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:43 pm
(Originally posted on ACS Blog.) [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm
Arris Group, Inc. v. [read post]
