Search for: "ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US " Results 481 - 500 of 3,972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
 Founded in the US in 2005, ChIPs is a nonpartisan, non-profit organization focused on advancing and connecting women in technology, law, and policy. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm by Nadia Kayyali
” As we argue: “technological advances have vastly augmented the government’s surveillance power and exposed much more personal information to government inspection and intrusive analysis. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:18 am by Paul Roberto Rodriguez Aviles
Moldex-Metric v. 3M Company, Case No. 3:16-cv-1533-MBS (D.S.C.), alleged that 3M and its predecessor, Aearo Technologies, Inc., knew the Combat Arms Version 2 earplug was too short for proper insertion into users’ ears and that the earplugs could loosen and not provide hearing protection for certain individuals. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:06 am by Hanni Fakhoury
In an increasingly digital world, using technology to communicate shouldn’t mean users surrender their privacy rights. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
“Unlike traditional newspapers, social media platforms, because of the technology they use, have in essence an unlimited ability to respond with their own speech to counter any hosted user speech with which they disagree” Internet services’ rebuttal powers are broader than newspapers??? [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Steve Dickinson
Advanced surveillance technologies, such as Faceprint and voiceprint technologies. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:01 am by Larry Ribstein
As most law students and corporate scholars know, Wilkes importantly qualified the same court’s case of the year before, Donahue v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
Even then Sindell recognized the gravity of the limited exception it was creating:In our contemporary complex industrialized society, advances in science and technology create fungible goods which may harm consumers and which cannot be traced to any specific producer. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm by LTA-Editor
Katzer can be used to interpret the terms of open-source licenses, including the GPL v.2, GPL v.3, Apache License v.2, BSD License, and the Mozilla Public License. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
But we cannot expect every judge or magistrate judge to be an expert in technology, let alone keep up with the quick succession of technological advancements. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In Pryanishnikov v Russia ([2019] ECHR 614), a case concerning the authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant a film reproduction license, the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the right to freedom of expression, as the only reason advanced by the domestic courts for the refusal of the relevant license had been based on mere suspicions rather than findings of fact. [read post]