Search for: "Abbott v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 714 F.3d 1311,1315 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The opinion’s unprecedented application of heightened scrutiny to a peremptory strike of a juror who was perceived to be gay bears significant implications for the same-sex marriage debate and for other laws that may give rise to distinctions based on sexual orientation.Indeed, today’s opinion is the only appellate decision since United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Lyle Denniston
This was the first federal appeals court decision to interpret the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision a year ago in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In reaching that result, the panel applied a “heightened scrutiny” analysis, saying that was now necessary after the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm by Lowell Brown
Momentum is strong in the wake of the court’s June 2013 decisions in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
By William Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Katherine Hart, Glen Hansen, and Brian Russell Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2014 1st Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases involving attorney’s fees in patent cases. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
Kelly, Sr., : COMPLAINT AND DEMAND: FOR JURY TRIALPlaintiff, ::v. :: Case No. 1:14-cv-879AbbVie Inc., and :Abbott Laboratories, Inc., ::Defendants. [read post]